MPR Underwriting
MPR Underwriting
  • About
  • Team
  • Products
  • Insights
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • About
  • Team
  • Products
  • Insights
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Linked in
  • Twitter
  • Data protection and privacy notice
  • Cookie Policy

Allocation in D&O
Policies

  • Home
  • Insights
  • Allocation in D&O Policies

Language Matters

D&O/Management Risks

    There is little doubt that Directors & Officers (‘D&O’) Liability is a sophisticated product which contains potentially complex concepts and processes. Despite the low profile in a D&O policy features showreel, ‘allocation’ is nonetheless a key component of any contract and plays a role in all claims. The principles behind allocation are straightforward and digestible and yet there are quite different approaches to the language, not all of which are clear, and some of which have potentially different outcomes.

    D&O claims can be single allegations against single insured persons for single remedies. Often, however, they embrace more complexity and involve multiple allegations against multiple parties for multiple remedies. In simple terms, allocation is the process of disentanglement which must take place to get to the components of the claim that the policy intends to cover.

    The process of allocation seeks to ‘allocate’ loss (defence costs and damages) between covered and uncovered parties and between covered and uncovered matters. Limited guidance exists from the courts in the UK, but those in the US have made it abundantly clear that allocation clauses are obligated to describe a precise methodology by which any allocation would be prescribed. They have also ruled that general expressions of intent, such as “best efforts,” do not necessarily satisfy this burden. Such an expression was, and is, rarely left unaccompanied as it was never sensible to use this as a methodology in and of itself. Underwriters seek to chaperone it with a specific allocation methodology, such as “relative legal and financial exposures of the covered parties to the covered matters”, to give the meaning much more certainty and clarity.

    D&O claims can be single allegations against single insured persons for single remedies. Often, however, they embrace more complexity and involve multiple allegations against multiple parties for multiple remedies. In simple terms, allocation is the process of disentanglement which must take place to get to the components of the claim that the policy intends to cover.

    It can often come as a surprise to find components of claims might not fall for cover, so an understanding of allocation is good to possess. Efforts to have ‘predetermined’ allocation have been made in the past, where the percentages were fixed, but this often only suited certain types of claim and may potentially be disadvantageous, depending on the circumstances. As much certainty as possible is preferable, whilst perhaps never definitively possible, but it is certainly worth considering the potential benefits of, for example, ‘imputability’ language, which carries that greater degree of certainty, over a more nebulous ‘fair’ allocation. And the concept of allocation is almost inextricably linked to the choice of lawyer in a D&O claim scenario, for reasons covered elsewhere. Allocation in D&O policies can be a divisive area, both literally and figuratively, and however it reads it can be central to the quality and effectiveness of a D&O policy.

    Download PDF

    Neil McCarthy

    Written by

    Neil McCarthy

    Language Matters

    D&O and PI Exclusions

    The ubiquity with which the professional services exclusion (“PSE”) appears on D&O policies might suggest a consistent and easily communicated position. Sadly, this is far from the case.

    Language Matters

    D&O Deductibles

    Once upon a time, deductibles were a common feature of Directors and Officers (‘D&O’) Liability policies. Typically reserved for larger or more challenging private risks, or those that were publicly listed, they faded from view as the soft market invaded every element of the contract.

    Language Matters

    Order of Payments

    The heritage of ‘Order of Payments’ or “Priority of Payments” clauses is rooted in the introduction of entity coverage to the Directors and Officers (“D&O”) policy architecture in the early 1990’s.

    10th Floor
    Chancery Place
    50 Brown Street
    Manchester
    M2 2JG

    0161 241 3550
    enquiries@mprunderwriting.com

    • About
    • Team
    • Our Products
    • Insights
    • Resources
    • Contact
    • Data protection and privacy notice
    • Cookie Policy
    • Linked in
    • Twitter
    MPR are Chartered Insurance Underwriting Agents

    MPR Underwriting Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales. Registered Address: 10th Floor, Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JG. Company Number: 10529758. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Privacy Policy and Cookie Information

    We use a small number of cookies on this website to make the website as useful as possible. None of these cookies collect any personal information. To find out more about these cookies and how to control their use, see our Read More.

    Close