MPR Underwriting
MPR Underwriting
  • About
  • Team
  • Products
  • Insights
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • About
  • Team
  • Products
  • Insights
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Linked in
  • Twitter
  • Data protection and privacy notice
  • Cookie Policy

To fee or not to fee

  • Home
  • Insights
  • To fee or not to fee

Insight

Employment Practices Liability

    ‘This “triumph for access to justice” will not be welcomed by all’. So declared Supreme Court judge, Lord Reed, on ruling unanimously in favour of Unison, following their appeal against the legality of the current system of employment tribunal fees. The finding held, on July 26, 2017, that the fees regime introduced in 2013 was unlawful and discriminated against women and the poorly paid.

    Amongst those who are unlikely to have welcomed the decision will be insurers of employment practices liability. The Institute of Directors warning that the decision would ‘open the door to a spike in malicious or vexatious claims’, will resonate loudly within this group.

    There is no doubting the impact that the introduction of fees has had. 191,541, tribunal claims were lodged in 2012/13. By 2014/15, the first full year after the fees were introduced, this had fallen to 61,308. This gave EPL insurers more stability around assumptions on profitability and pricing. Whilst an argument existed that those that did succeed were likely to cost more (due in part to the higher burden of proof and levels of confidence, together with the increased availability of tribunal time extending hearings), loss costs would have declined sharply. Moreover, in the four years since the fees were introduced, insurers will have launched products to market based on certain behavioural assumptions at existing levels (ACAS is generally considered to be the best barometer of employment relations in the UK), and existing participants may have calibrated their products to remain competitive. Almost at a stroke, there could be a funding deficiency in this line for some insurers. The ‘floodgates’ metaphor is a timeworn and often uninspired refrain, but this is as close as we’re likely to come to being able to evidence the impact of a legal change on outcomes, given the prior position.

    Claimants may take the view they will continue with the claim because it will cost them nothing…

    It is early days, and things may change in favour of EPL insurers. However, the change is effective immediately and, given the unambiguous ruling, it is likely nothing will happen to mitigate the position in the short term. It also remains to be seen what impact this will have on Early Conciliation. Claimants may take the view they will continue with the claim because it will cost them nothing, and because there is an almost statistically insignificant chance of exposure to fees, so we watch this aspect with interest. Whether reduced fees appear in time, we will see, but it is still quite difficult to see how they could be re-introduced in light of the unanimity amongst the seven judges. As for the insurers position, equally, time will tell. However, given this ruling, and other pending changes such as gender pay gap reporting, due to be introduced in April 2018 for firms with more than 250 staff, it certainly seems as though there has been a restacking of the odds in the employees favour.

    For more detail take a look here.

    Neil McCarthy

    Written by

    Neil McCarthy

    News

    MPR and AXIS Specialty
    Extend Day One Relationship
    to 2025

    MPR is thrilled to extend our relationship with AXIS for another three years.

    Insight

    How to Choose a D&O Liability Limit

    The question of how to choose a Directors and Officers (“D&O”) liability policy limit is one which is frequently visited. Unhelpfully, there is no clear and unequivocal way to answer.

    Insight

    Corporate Manslaughter &
    Management Liability

    Nearly 10 years after the introduction of The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (the “Act”) was introduced, it’s possible to reflect and measure the impact on the management liability landscape.

    10th Floor
    Chancery Place
    50 Brown Street
    Manchester
    M2 2JG

    0161 241 3550
    enquiries@mprunderwriting.com

    • About
    • Team
    • Our Products
    • Insights
    • Resources
    • Contact
    • Data protection and privacy notice
    • Cookie Policy
    • Linked in
    • Twitter
    MPR are Chartered Insurance Underwriting Agents

    MPR Underwriting Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales. Registered Address: 10th Floor, Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JG. Company Number: 10529758. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Privacy Policy and Cookie Information

    We use a small number of cookies on this website to make the website as useful as possible. None of these cookies collect any personal information. To find out more about these cookies and how to control their use, see our Read More.

    Close